Volume 15, Issue 29 (12-2025)
mth 2025, 15(29): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahbarnia Z, Ebrahimy F. (2025). A comparative study of pragmatist aesthetics in two examples of painting poetry by artificial intelligence from the two cultures of China and Iran (the studied examples: the work of birds and fishes by Mahmoud Farshchian and the work of Koh Bahar and the fishing boat). mth. 15(29), : 1 doi:10.61186/mth.2014
URL: http://mth.aui.ac.ir/article-1-2014-en.html
URL: http://mth.aui.ac.ir/article-1-2014-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts, Al-Zahra University, Iran. , Z.rahbarnia@alzahra.ac.ir
2- Doctoral student of art, Faculty of Art, research at Alzahra University, Iran.
2- Doctoral student of art, Faculty of Art, research at Alzahra University, Iran.
Abstract: (1024 Views)
Pragmatist aesthetics is an approach that emphasizes that beauty is considered as an individual experience and directly related to human practical life. This theory focuses on the importance of experiencing beauty and the active participation of people in the process of creating and shaping beauty to improve the quality of life. Interactive art is presented as a beautiful experience and an opportunity for active participation of people in creating beauty. The selected research method is analytical-comparative. This comparative study is based on the analysis of two examples of interactive poem-painting from traditional Chinese painting and Iranian painting with pragmatic aesthetic theory. The Chinese example allows ordinary users to create poetry from traditional Chinese painting by using the interactive visual program of Ipot. Similarly, in the example of Iran, the bulbul-zaban robot is used to create poetry from painting. The aim of this research is to match the quality of perception in the interactive visual program of Ipot and the bulbul-zaban robot based on the analysis of the pragmatist aesthetic theory in order to answer the research question, what is the perception of the pragmatic aesthetic theory in interactive art? And what are the differences and similarities of pragmatist aesthetics in the two studied examples? The research hypothesis is that; These two examples are efficient and developed tools in the process of creating interactive poetry-painting. The findings of this research show that the iput program in the Chinese sample plays an important role in the interactive process of creating poetry-paintings from the understanding of users and ancient Chinese paintings. Also, in the Iranian sample, the user using the Bulbulzaban program gets inspiration from Mahmoud Farshchian's paintings and poems with a theme. Creates in harmony with the image. The important features of pragmatic aesthetics, such as continuity in artistic components, the existence of experience in life, being influenced by the social and cultural context, and functionalism are observed in the components of both examples, which shows that the use of this approach is very effective in artistic and cultural experience.
Article number: 1
Keywords: Interactive Art, Iput interactive Visual Program, Bulbul-Zaban Robot, Poetry-Painting, China, Iran.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Visual Arts
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
