Volume 10, Issue 20 (2-2021)
mth 2021, 10(20): 47-60 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Haghayegh A, ShayestehFar M. (2021). Diplomacy and representation: A comparative analysis of the representation of the Safavid ambassador in the presence of the Mughal and Ottoman rulers. mth. 10(20), 47-60. doi:10.52547/mth.10.20.47
URL: http://mth.aui.ac.ir/article-1-1477-en.html
URL: http://mth.aui.ac.ir/article-1-1477-en.html
1- PhD of Islamic Art, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. , azin.haghayegh@gmail.com
2- Associate Profesor of Islamic Art, Faculity of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran,Iran.
2- Associate Profesor of Islamic Art, Faculity of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran,Iran.
Abstract: (3647 Views)
In the present paper, attempts have been made to find the differences and identify the functions of representation and objectives of producers of the works through a comparative study of two paintings with the same subject from the Ottoman and Mughal illustrated historical manuscripts. The approach of new cultural history, especially Peter Burke’s views on the common patterns of “representation of the other”, forms the theoretical framework of the research. According to the theme of the paintings, which is related to the diplomatic relations of Iran during the Safavid dynasty with its neighbors, the images will be examined and analyzed in relation to their contemporary political relations and events. Based on this, the present study seeks to answer the following two main questions:
1- How was the exposure pattern of the Mughals and the Ottomans with the Safavids as the other?
2-What was the political function of the representations in the Ottomans and Mughals visual chronology?
The purpose of this study was to find the meaningful relations between how and function of representation the Safavids in political-cultural systems which works of art were its product and then, answer the reason of representations. Findings suggest that representation of the Safavids in Ottomans and Mughals visual chronology are performed differently in similarly themed paintings; and different aspects of this political event have been emphasized. Mughals chose the pattern of analogy and adaptation at the other side Ottomans select the pattern of Othering and opposition. The reason for these choices goes back to the function that these representations had for the Ottomans and the Mughals. The nature of this research is historical according to the subject of the research, which is the study of events in the past, and the research method is based on how the research is conducted, analytical-comparative and case study. The method of data collection is library research and the method of sampling is purposeful, non-random, and selectively based on the content of the images.
1- How was the exposure pattern of the Mughals and the Ottomans with the Safavids as the other?
2-What was the political function of the representations in the Ottomans and Mughals visual chronology?
The purpose of this study was to find the meaningful relations between how and function of representation the Safavids in political-cultural systems which works of art were its product and then, answer the reason of representations. Findings suggest that representation of the Safavids in Ottomans and Mughals visual chronology are performed differently in similarly themed paintings; and different aspects of this political event have been emphasized. Mughals chose the pattern of analogy and adaptation at the other side Ottomans select the pattern of Othering and opposition. The reason for these choices goes back to the function that these representations had for the Ottomans and the Mughals. The nature of this research is historical according to the subject of the research, which is the study of events in the past, and the research method is based on how the research is conducted, analytical-comparative and case study. The method of data collection is library research and the method of sampling is purposeful, non-random, and selectively based on the content of the images.
References
1. آفتاب، اصغر (1364). تاریخ‌نویسی فارسی در هند و پاکستان: تیموریان بزرگ از بابر تا اورنگ زیب 1118-932 ﻫ.ق. چاپ اول، لاهور پاکستان: خانه فرهنگ جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
2. الحسینی القمی، احمد بن شرف‌الدین حسین (1363). خلاصه‌التواریخ. تصحیح احسان اشراقی، چاپ دوم، جلد اول، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
3. ارآوجی، مصطفی (1392). مروری بر منابع مربوط به روابط عثمانی-صفوی. تاریخ روابط ایران و عثمانی در عصر صفوی. به کوشش و ترجمه نصرالله صالحی. تهران: طهوری. 29-15.
4. برک، پیتر (1385). تاریخ فرهنگی چیست؟ ترجمه نعمت‌الله فاضلی و مرتضی قلیچ، چاپ سوم، تهران: پژوهشکده تاریخ اسلام.
5. جعفریان، رسول (1379). صفویه در عرصه دین، فرهنگ و سیاست. چاپ سوم، جلد اول، قم: پژوهشکده حوزه و دانشگاه.
6. حقایق، آذین (1398). "بازنمایی صفویان در وقایع‌نگاری تصویری گورکانیان و عثمانیان (1038-930 هجری-قمری)". رساله دکتری، هنر اسلامی. تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
7. سودآور، ابوالعلاء (1380). هنر دربارهای ایران. ترجمه ناهید محمد شمیرانی، چاپ اول، تهران: کارنگ.
8. سیوری، راجر (1380). در باب صفویان. ترجمه رمضان علی روح‌الهی، چاپ اول، تهران: مرکز.
9. علامی، ابوالفضل بن مبارک (1372). اکبرنامه تاریخ گورکانیان هند. به کوشش غلامرضا طباطبایی مجد، چاپ اول، تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و تحقیقات فرهنگی بنگاه.
10. علامی، ابوالفضل بن مبارک (1892 م.). آئین اکبری. لکهنو: مطبع منشی نولکشور، چاپ سنگی، آرشیو دیجیتال کتابخانه ملی ایران.
11. فلسفی، نصرالله (1371). زندگی شاه عباس اول. چاپ دوم، جلد دوم، تهران: علمی.
12. منشی قزوینی، بوداق (1378). جواهرالاخبار (بخش تاریخ ایران از قراقویونلو تا سال 982 ﻫ.ق.). مقدمه، تصحیح و تعلیقات محسن بهرام‌نژاد، چاپ اول، تهران: میراث مکتوب.
13. اکبرنامه (1595-1590) نسخه خطی، شماره دسترسی: IS.2:27-1896.
14. A.3595 شاهنامه سلیم‌خان (1581-1571)نسخه خطی، شماره.
15. Arcak, S. (2012). "Gifts in Motion: Ottoman- Safavid Cultural Exchange, 15011618". Ph.D thises, University of Minnesota.
16. Atil, E. (1986). Suleymanname: The Illustrated History of Suleyman the Magnificent. New York: National Gallery of Art.
17. Beach, M. C. & Koch, E. (1997). The King of the World: The Badshahnama: An Imperial Mughal Manuscript from the Royal Library. Windsor Castle: Thames & Hudson.
18. Biederman, Z.n; Riello, G. & Gerritsen, A. (2018). Global Gifts and the Material Culture of Diplomacy in Early Modern Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/9781108233880]
19. Burke, P. (2001). Eye witnessing: the uses of images as historical evidence. London: Reaktion Books. [DOI:10.1038/eye.2001.3]
20. Ettinghausen, R. (1963). Historical Subject/ The East/ Islam. Encyclopedia of World Art, VII, 496-497.
21. Fetvaci, E.(2009). The Production of the Şehnāme-i Selīm Ḫān. Muqarnas. 26,263-315.
https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993_02601012 [DOI:10.1163/22118993-90000152]
22. Matthee, R. (2012). GIFT GIVING IV. In The Safavid Period. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/gift-giving-iv (Retrieved 3 March. 2019).
23. Savory, R.M. (1960). Ḳi̊zi̊l-Bās̲h̲. in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Bearman, P.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C.E.; van Donzel, E. & Heinrichs, W.P. (Eds.). Leiden, The Netherlands : Brill Academic Publishers. 243-244.
24. Stronge, S. (2002). Painting for the Mughal Emperor- the Art of the book 1660-1560. London: V&A Publication.
25. Uluc, L. (2006). Turkman Governors Shiraz Artisans and Ottoman Collectors; Sixteenth Century Shiraz Manuscripts. Istanbul: Turkiye Bankasi.
26. URL 1: https://www.agakhanmuseum.org/collection/artifact/portrait-isa-khan-qurchibashi-shah-abbas-i-akm153 (access date: 2020/06/05).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
